Vintage Miracle Crusade

At 8:00 pm darkness quietly steals across the soccer field. But darkness isn’t the only thing stealing. A shouting woman from the raised platform blasts her voice via 10 four-foot-high speakers in English and Tsonga to a waiting crowd of several hundred. “Do you want a miracle?”

Crowd responds with roars and cheers.

“Then don’t give R10 ($1.50) and expect a R10,000 ($1,500) miracle!”

Crowd responds with mild, begrudging roar.

Holding up a stack of envelopes, she continues, “If you want me to pray for you, then come take an envelope. But these envelopes are only for people who will pay at least R100 ($15).” She then asked for translators to explain that to all the grandmothers who were there because they get a government pension of R700 every month. The “preaching” hasn’t even started yet. The offering went on for nearly an hour.

The platform has multi-colored lights and huge brightly painted signs saying, “Miracles!” and “Jesus”. I spotted at least 8 people I have witnessed to in the past who are not converted and know they are not. One of them was an usher at the crusade that week who lives with a woman he is not married to in a one-room shack. He gave money in the offering.

You might be tempted to think that some of my descriptions are exaggerated, but I think 9 out of 10 people would have called his platform motions and antics clown-like. He shouted for the entire time. His favorite pose was looking away from the people. He continually interrupted the translator. Several times he bent over to the ground shouting to his voice’s extremity.

For 10 days this white man openly lied (“I will not leave this city until no one has AIDS!” and “Everyone of you will get a job this week!”), twisted the Scripture (“Elijah killed the false prophet of poverty! He killed the false prophet of HIV!”), and perverted the Gospel (“You are all children of God!  I don’t want to talk about Hell, I just want everyone to be happy!”).

But his message wasn’t wholly lacking in intellectual content. I learned that poverty is a demon that he could cast out. During one particularly memorable segment, he also assured us that if we had faith, then money would fill our pockets. Of course, he was a man of faith, because his 2008 Mercedes wasn’t hidden from view. He also closed his sermon by asking people to raise their hands if they love him and his ministry. He never asked the same question about Jesus or the Bible.

He began his “miracles” each night about 10:00 pm, 90% of which included causing people to collapse and pretending to throw the Holy Spirit like a baseball to other people.  There wasn’t one word about the people’s sin, God’s anger, Hell, or faith alone in Christ alone. But they did have an “altar call.”  Every night the crowd increased.

The day before the crusade started I had visited with the “preacher” who styled himself as an apostle and a prophet. “Hi, my name is Seth and I am a pastor here in the area.  I was wondering if you could tell me what your goal is with this crusade?”

Without a moment’s hesitation, “Miracles, signs, and wonders,” he said with an edge in his voice.

He failed the first question. Let me make it easier. “I am a pastor who loves the Gospel.  It’s my burden to explain the way of salvation to people. What will you be hoping to do this week?” I asked him for the second time not really because I thought he would have the right answer, but to make my point even clearer.

“Miracles from the Holy Spirit.” He failed the second question even after I gave him a hint. But at least he was honest that time. He didn’t say he would preach the Gospel, and he didn’t.

Crusades like this are the heart and soul of African Christianity in this region, and I suspect other areas are the same. Here are some of my musings on this mess that will hopefully provoke you to prayer for us.

  1. Missionaries need to know the Gospel. The music was bad. The stage antics were man-centered. The offering was criminal. But the confusion that crusade made about the way of salvation was immoral. Again I was convinced that God’s plan for saving sinners must be the preeminent theme of study for a missionary who would evangelize so that his converts remain in 25 years.
  2. True logic doesn’t serve Satan. Fuzzy thinking helps the false teacher. For that reason, we’ve been catechizing our teens on principles of logic in youth group. A large-scale shortage of logic is not a good field to grow soldiers of the Cross.

[This was my report from March 2008, but it’s still entirely relevant.]

Posted in Accounts of African Religion, Prosperity gospel | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

A Self-esteem Corrective

Salvation, then, does not come to sinners because they are inherently desirable, but because the Son is inherently worthy of the Father’s gift. After all, the purpose of redemption is that the Son might be eternally exalted by the redeemed—it is not for the honor of the sinner but the honor of the Son.

John MacArthur, forward to Foundations of Grace

Posted in Quotes | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Trouble with Illustrations

Perhaps you can relate to an illustration gone awry.

Let me illustrate. Two conservatives are in a discussion, and one compares the other to a liberal. The friend who has been illustrated sees this as an unfitting epithet whereas the illustrator was merely trying to make a simple point.

Or a husband and wife are discussing some family matter, when one compares the other to another family friend whose name in that particular context may be a synonym for undue harshness and irrationality.

Much of my life’s calling is somehow bound up with communication, so I am constantly searching for the right illustration that can drive the point home more poignantly. But here’s the difficulty: Nearly every illustration can be interpreted such that the speaker would deny the conclusion derived from the illustration he personally chose.

One source of this potential confusion comes from the nature of language as an analogy. Illustrations are lengthened forms of language’s many analogies that good communicators often use. God is a fortress, a rock, and a mother hen. (Psalm 18:2; 91:4) He rides on the clouds. (Psalm 104:3) He holds the oceans in His hand. (Psalm 95:4) The Kingdom of Heaven is like a farmer with seeds; a man finding a treasure; and a fisherman. (Matt. 13)

These uses of language are brief illustrations drawing pictures and making connections in our minds between two or more ideas. But no one expects these figures of speech to match on every point. When Luther wrote a “Mighty Fortress” he wasn’t trying to say that God is composed of bricks and mortar, or worse yet, that He had a beginning and an inevitable end like every fortress we’ve ever known has.

Rather, the illustration has a key similarity—at least one if it’s a good illustration—between the picture and the reality. Pictures don’t need to be the same at all points to communicate well. God’s “rockness” paints a picture of unshakeable durability, the ultimate standard for that which is classic. But it would be a great sin to apply the rock’s lack of personality to Jehovah.

To properly fit, illustrations do not need to match at every point. Indeed, if they did, they would be too close to the object to be dissimilar from what they were illustrating. It would be like saying, “I can best illustrate that chair with another similar chair.” Their needs to be some lack of sameness for an illustration to work.

But there must be at least one obvious similarity for an illustration to be effective. The problem comes with that word “obvious” because discussions employing illustrations often involve parties who disagree. Therefore, one party can take the most flattering similarities in the illustration and the other party will see the most irrelevant dissimilarities as the most obvious meaning.

So, who gets to decide which meaning goes with any given illustration? In may be a bit of oversimplification (but just a bit) to say that God does. Metaphors that have been inscripturated are right because God chose them as pictures of His meaning in any given statement. Of course, most of our communication and tension does not come from debates over what is the right interpretation of the parable of the Wheat and Tares. Scripture still speaks even to illustrative use in day-to-day life.

  1. I must always choose illustrations that consider my hearers’ real needs before my own. (Phil. 2:3-4)
  2. I must always choose illustrations that are not sneaky ways to insult or get in a “dig” on my opponent. (1 Cor. 13:4-7)
  3. I must always choose illustrations that follow the normal use of language following the patterns in Scriptural literature.

There are other principles that can be drawn out of the Bible, but at the most basic level it should be remembered that illustrations in general do not need to match the reality at every point. Usually, one main similarity will do. Usually. Like the way a wrench doesn’t have to loosen every bolt for it still to be a valid addition to the toolbox.

Posted in Hermeneutics | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Attractive Leadership

[William Carey] is most remarkable for his humility; he is a very superior man, and appears to know nothing about it.

The great man and the little child unite in him, and, as far as I can see, he has attained to the happy art of ruling and overruling in connection with the others mentioned, without his asserting his authority, or others feeling their subjection; and all is done without the least appearance of design on his part.

An E. Pritchett, missionary to Burma writing about Carey’s leadership of the mission team in 1811.

Posted in Orthopathy, Quotes, Unusual character | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Keeping the Tyrants Straight

Keeping the Tyrants Straight, from a recent post by Amy.

Here’s a recent conversation at our house:

Seth: I have to go to a funeral tomorrow.
Amy: Oh! Who died?
Seth: Hitler’s mom.
Amy: Ohhh. That’s too bad.
Seth: No, not Hitler from church. The other Hitler. The man.
Amy: Do I know him?
Seth: I don’t think so. He worked on the road with me.

Pause.

Amy: Oh! Oops. I was thinking of Saddam Hussein’s mom.
Seth: Yeah, it’s hard keeping all those moms-of-tyrants straight.

Posted in Multiculturalism, Quotes | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Kind of Character that Makes History

One of Carey’s Indian language helpers said about him (when he was about 45),

What kind of body has Carey Sahib? I cannot understand him. He never seems hungry nor tired, and never leaves a thing till it’s finished.

As recorded by his teammate William Ward.

 

Posted in Quotes, Unusual character | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

How to Evaluate Movies

While looking for a source today, I came across chapter 3 of a book by John Frame where he offers 12 ways to judge films. Left unstirred by his list, I compiled a few questions myself to ask about movies.

  1. What does this film encourage you to love?
  2. Does this film desensitize you to the horror of sin?
  3. Does the writing and plot encourage classic and enduring values? Does it–even as entertainment–make you grow to see beauty, complexity, or truth in a previously overlooked area or perspective?
  4. Will this movie enable me to think and meditate more clearly, or does it have the life-sapping, mind-numbing quality of much modern fare?
  5. Is it written for a youth culture that demands constant action, trivial plots, bathroom humor, animal stimuli, and foolish authorities corrected by heroic kids?
  6. Does it glorify unscriptural, unrealistic gender roles?
  7. Is sin consistently punished, or is it sometimes “the only way” to solve the problem?
  8. Does it degrade the sacred? Do the setting, characters, lines, and story massage the viewer’s feelings into enjoying the profane or even the banal?

Yes, I recognize that there is a lot of overlap within the questions, and ultimately they all may be branches projecting off the trunk of the first question. If so, then maybe we’ll get the point: We cannot rightly judge art without examining the effects on our feelings.

 

Posted in Lists, Orthopathy | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

What It Takes to Be a Missionary

Here is the covenant that Carey wrote for the missionaries who served together with him at Serampore.

  1. To set an infinite value on men’s souls.
  2. To acquaint ourselves with the snares which hold the minds of the people.
  3. To abstain from whatever deepens India’s prejudice against the Gospel.
  4. To watch for every chance of doing the people good.
  5. To preach ‘Christ crucified’ as the grand means of conversions.
  6. To esteem and treat Indians always as our equals.
  7. To guard and build up ‘the hosts that may be gathered.’
  8. To cultivate their spiritual gifts, ever pressing upon them their missionary obligation–since Indians only can win India for Christ.
  9. To labour unceasingly in biblical translation.
  10. To be instant in the nurture of personal religion.
  11. To give ourselves without reserve to the cause, ‘not counting even the clothes we wear our own’.

A competent knowledge of the languages current where a missionary lives, a mild and winning temper, and a heart given up to God–these are the attainments, which, more than all other gifts, will fit us to become God’s instruments in the great work of human redemption.

 

I bolded my favorites. William Carey by S. Pearce Carey, page 240.

 

Posted in Lists, Orthopathy | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“The Language of Faith”

Recently, after my wife commented that our little church really didn’t have money yet to build our church building she was puzzled when the man responded to her that the church actually did have the money. He argued very simply that any potential we have is also a reality that we possess.

When I piped up that this use of language turns subjects into predicates, I was told, “That is the language of faith.”

Really? Having faith, firmly believing, Sola Fide—these terms refer to positively speaking about what we hope might happen?

As the conversation progressed (or digressed depending on your point of view), I asked for some substantiation that allows us to blur the line between reality and mere possibility. This brother replied, “Abraham. He believed God, and started acting like a father before he was a father.”

“Wait a minute,” I shot back, “Abraham believed God’s revelation. He was clearly told that he would have a son. That was the object of his faith.”

The conversation ended amiably, but not logically, because these fellow Christians were wrapped up in at least one of the tentacles of the Word Faith, prosperity gospel foolishness. That brief interaction had all the marks of positive confession—make sure that whatever you say is always upbeat and positive because your words create reality.

Hank Hanegraaff has documented the links between Christianized positive confession and its New Age sire, and the connection is not hard to find. New Age teaching emphasizes invisible, extra-logical life forces that can be accessed by words—positive statements bring goodness, health, and joy whereas negative statements bring ugliness, pain, and sorrow.

Of course, as with most false teachings, this one tries to limp along with a superficial appeal to a verse or two. “Death and life are in the power of the tongue.” (Pro. 18:21) Solomon is simply teaching that words can help aid spiritual beings to glorify God or they can tempt spiritual beings to sin. He is not saying that verbal units by themselves somehow release their bottled-up creative life force whenever they are spoken. In short, Solomon was not saying that words are magical. He was (and still is) saying that words have the potential of really affecting fellow Christians or sinners by putting ideas into their minds on which they can act.

Positive confession is an entirely false doctrine. The Bible never ascribes creative power to man or anything in man. Rather, God is the only being with creative power. His words have power because of His being, not because of some inherent power in the words outside of the Speaker. (Heb. 1:3; 11:3; 1 Pet. 1:23; 2 Pet. 3:5)

More than that, the Bible repeatedly tells us to trust God and His Word, but never to trust our own words or ways. Men who trust themselves (or their own words) are called fools. (Pro. 3:5-7; 28:26; Isa. 26:3) The power of words is wholly derived from the ideas they communicate. Ideas are powerful, but even they only have power as they move men to act and think in certain ways.

If Christians are going to obey the Bible, follow Jesus’ example, or think clearly then there will be times when they need to say negative things. At times when truth is at stake, to refuse to speak negatively is cowardice and sin. See Jesus’ “negative confession” in Matt. 23.

Positive confession effectively destroys church discipline because discipline requires critical discernment, negative rebuke, and sorrow over the consequences of sin. It weakens Sola Scriptura because the actual verses of Scripture are not as important as the spoken positive confessions. And it discourages critical, scientific, evidence-based thinking which is not only necessary to interpret the Bible but is essential to defeat the poverty that so many who believe the prosperity gospel live with everyday.

“The language of faith” is one more term to add to the list of cues that the prosperity gospel is in your midst.

Posted in Hermeneutics, Prosperity gospel | Tagged , , | 8 Comments

Laziness Can Be a Reason for Separation

Perhaps one of the most controversial aspects of Christian unity is the idea that Christians are obligated to break fellowship with other true Christians. In a given scenario, both are brothers in Christ, but the one is ethically bound to withhold unity because the other is disobedient. This is the situation that is presented in different ways in Scripture and clearly is the case in 2 Thessalonians 3.

Paul takes a significant portion of the 3rd chapter of a relatively small letter to instruct the church regarding lazy members. Apparently, these members were so eager for the Lord’s return that they were not working at their regular jobs. (3:7-12) In order then to meet their basic needs they were taking from others. This kind of welfare mentality received a stern rebuke from the apostle at the beginning of this discussion in 3:6 and then again at the end in 3:14.

Because the language is so clear, those with a high view of Scripture can accept church discipline in the case of indolence. But the controversy is over whether that text speaks to anything more than believers who refuse to earn a salary. Does it, in fact, also deal with broader issues such as ecclesiastical relationships?

Yes, for several reasons, but here’s just one. Laziness is a perspective on all sins. Is any sin not a kind of laziness?

When a Christian man looks at a woman with lust he knows that he should not do that, but he is tired of always denying himself. So he gives in, which is another way to say he got lazy.

When a Christian business man is tempted to act corruptly, he is being pulled by his flesh to stop the hard work of fighting against easy money, integrity, and delayed gratification, which is another way to say he is being tempted to be lazy about those spiritual disciplines.

When a popular Christian pastor admits on national television that he does not know what the Mormons believe and so he has no problem with endorsing the salvation testimony of one of the cult’s members, is he not being too lazy to read a few books or even a Wikipedia entry on his iPhone? If he does know what the cult believes and he is lying on television, is his lie not a form of laziness because he is unwilling to build the character necessary to speak the truth at all times and then work hard through the consequences which may include a lot of mail or decreased attendance and offerings? If he knows what the cult believes, but is not able to tell the difference between the cult and orthodoxy, is he not still falling to the sin of laziness for not (at the least) downloading John Piper’s sermons for free and learning what the Gospel is? This pastor (be he real or fictional) fits Paul’s description of a lazy man in 2 Thessalonians 3.

Other reasons could be added to this one, but the point is clear: Paul’s closing lines to the Thessalonians require Christians under some circumstances to withhold fellowship from other professing believers.

Posted in Hermeneutics | Tagged , | Leave a comment